An Abundant World

Do you remember the movie “Spaceballs” by comedic legend Mel Brooks? There is a scene in which President Skroob, played by Mel Brooks, reaches into his desk drawer to open a can of clean “Perri-air” after assuring a news agency that “there is absolutely no air shortage whatsoever.” While it may seem ludicrous that there would ever be a scarcity of clean air, living in polluted cities such as Beijing, Manila, or Los Angeles shows that clean air is not as abundant as it once was.

For most of us, it is hard to imagine an abundant society. Abundance sounds nice. The concept of living in an abundant world feels good. No more worries about survival.  Access to everything we may need or want. However, unless you are part of the group of people that comprise the top 0.1% of economic income, the reality of an abundant world feels like a pipe dream.


The Opposite Of Abundance Is Scarcity

The opposite of abundance is scarcity. Most people are familiar with scarcity – scarcity of money, time, and meaning for the more fortunate or food, water, and shelter for the least. A cursory glance at the conditions of human life on earth might conclude that we live in a scarce world, but is that really true?

If one defines scarcity as an “insufficiency or shortness of supply”, then it should be fairly easy to distinguish whether we live in a scarce world. We simply ask the question, “is there enough of x to meet the needs of all human beings?” Let’s see…

Statistics show that there are an estimated 925 million hungry people in the world, which would imply that food is scarce. However, the world produces 2,720 kilocalories per person per day of food, more than enough to feed everyone on the planet. Food is not scarce.

Statistics show that approximately 630,000 people in the United States are homeless, which would imply that housing is scarce. However, there are over 19 million vacant homes in the United States, more than enough to house all those living on the streets. Housing is not scarce either.

It seems as though there is enough supply to meet the need for both food and housing, yet the reality for many people is that they are both scarce. They simply do not have the money to afford these basic necessities. Is money scarce?

money-256314_640 copy

Statistics show the amount of government and personal debt in the United States is now more than $34 trillion dollars, which would imply a lack of money. However, there is about $10 trillion dollars in the money supply.

Wait one second! Money is scarce! And when you investigate why, you will find that it is not scarce by accident. Due to the manner in which money comes into existence through interest-bearing debt, money is always in short supply. This is because when loans are made, only the principle is created, while the corresponding interest must be found in the marketplace in a never ending competition to avoid bankruptcy. And herein lies the problem. Why would the resource required for sustaining life in this economy be purposefully made scarce? (If we look hard enough, we may even find the source of our competitive world as well.)


Abundance And Free Market Economics Don’t Mix

Abundance is the enemy of a free market economy.  One need only attempt to sell an abundant resource (i.e. sand at the beach) to realize the futility in that endeavor. In the free market system, goods must be scarce so that people would be willing to buy them.

Long ago, entertainment, in the form of community gatherings, singing groups, and town festivals was abundant and free. Today, most people purchase entertainment through television, movies, sports, and concerts making the entertainment business a multi-billion dollar industry.  From entertainment to child care to bottled water, many modern products and services that were once abundant and free have been made scarce and consequently are able to be bought and sold. But are there examples of things that were once scarce that have become abundant, and what kind of impact did that have?

Thirty years ago, a gigabyte (GB) of data storage was very scarce.  It fetched a hefty sum close to half a million dollars.  Today a GB of data storage costs about seven cents retail and as low as three cents wholesale.  Storing a digital copy of a two-hour movie costs less than a dime.  While still not free and as abundant as air, many companies such as Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Dropbox offer many gigabytes of free personal storage to any user with an e-mail address.  Data storage is now abundant.

This abundance of data storage has led to a revolution in global communications that is connecting the human race unlike ever before. People are now able to upload and share digital content on what would have been considered to be an unimaginable scale just a few decades ago, causing a huge leap in the extension of human empathy globally. This is not the first time that new technologies created abundance that transformed society.

As Jeremy Rifkin writes in The Empathic Civilization:

“Before print, people shared their thoughts together orally, in face-to-face dialogue and exchange. The print revolution helped nurture a more meditative environment… The mnemonic redundancy of oral communication and the subjective eccentricities of medieval script were replaced by a more rational, calculating, analytical approach to knowledge… This shift in consciousness prepared the way for a new idea of human progress [and the Industrial Revolution].”

The Pathway To An Abundant World

The emergence of free, ubiquitous sharing of information, the dawn of the information age, and the ability for people around the world to connect, collaborate and share ideas has created a unifying force with the potential to transform civilization itself.

That is if we can create abundant energy. Despite being around for a century, energy is becoming scarcer, as evidenced by the steady rise of gas prices. Additionally, oil pollution resulting from the Deepwater Horizon spill and higher CO2 concentrations from the filthy Alberta Tar Sands pose other ecologically-transparent, yet economically-hidden, costs. If this trend continues, fewer people will be able to afford to drive cars, heat their homes, and even buy food. However, the world uses an estimated 16 terawatts of electricity annually – solar power has the potential to produce 6,000 times current global production, certainly enough to create abundant energy.

Abundant, distributed, clean energy is the key to a just and sustainable world. With abundant energy, there can be abundant water. With abundant water, there can be abundant food. The time is now to abandon rigid ideologies and theories of an invisible hand promising an elusive global prosperity and embrace the obvious necessity to transform our energy infrastructure to allow for the sharing of clean, distributed, abundant energy. Let us embrace new ways of thinking, explore new economic systems and living arrangements that promote abundance, and keep the cans of clean air relegated to space of satirical comedies.




  • Mike s.

    Inform me when modern society figure out how to reduce making a huge amount of waste

    • deks

      We already know how to reduce making huge amounts of waste, or waste in general.

      We can easily produce 10x more compared to what we do now (keeping in mind we already are generating abundance) using 3x less resources from landfills alone.

      There would be 0 need to get new raw materials from the Earth itself when we can utilize recycling for the purpose of remaking trash into not just usable, but superior synthetic materials that can be produced in abundance.

      As for energy – first commercial geothermal power plant came into operation in 1911.
      Keep in mind that geothermal doesn’t produce contaminants in the first place (the only byproduct is steam).
      Right now, Humanity can easily tap into 2000 Zettajoules of Geothermal power with the the technology we have readily available.
      2000 Zettajoules is enough to last us 4000 years btw, and with creating those power plants by converting trash or outdated power plants into Geothermal ones, we can easily spend LESS energy and overall resources in the process.

      Same is with solar. Commercial solar technology is NOT made with best possible methods we have available, nor is it made with highest possible technical efficiency we can muster.
      Instead, ALL commercial technology is a byproduct of COST EFFICIENCY (which has nothing to do with technical efficiency).
      Cost efficiency dictates you have to spend least amount of money initially for the purpose of generating PROFITS, resulting in usage of ‘cheap’ materials and methods of production as well as planned obsolescence.

      Money is holding us back.
      Pure and simple.
      Its not about whether we have the money or who will pay for it.
      The question was always: do we have the resources, the technology and the know how to make something happen? The answer to that is YES.

      • chrisagnos

        Great comment. Thank you!

        • serghiey

          How would you create all the solar panel you need to create such an amount of energy to cover everybody needs? You need expensive materials and a lot of energy to install them, and still you do not have electricity at night.
          Furthermore, the energy density with solar is much less, to power highly intensive activities, like for industry. To store electricity you would need lot of short living polluting batteries.

          How much land you have to drill to extract enough geothermal power? Do we have a better use for it? Even having a lot of electricity, you cannot eat it: to transform solar energy into food, no one can beat the efficiency of what nature does with photosynthesis in plants.

          I agree with your point that we need to change the market rules in a more sustainable form. Today the energy from fossil fuels is still relatively cheap, with respect to other sources, still as you well describe, the inequalities in having food and housing are quite large.

          I think we need to better design the way we produce food and warm up houses, while looking at the energy problem.

          • chrisagnos

            I think most of the energy we consume today is to fuel the world devouring machine. All the energy consumed driving to jobs that do nothing except service this machine. When we become a lot more localized, we will consume far less energy than we do today. And we will use it more efficiently as well as we leave behind the inefficiencies of the combustion process. So I am not advocating for a simple swapping of energy technologies and then economic growth can resume.

        • serghiey

          Another problem is the transportation system, almost totally based on oil, that it would require a widespread effort, resources and time for a complete conversion to electricity.

  • To Be Aware

    […] void of pollution and toxic chemicals, and sustainable ways of living on the planet. An abundant world is possible but only if we take yet another cue from nature by focusing on meeting the present […]

  • To Be Aware

    […] we need a system that efficiently allocates scarcity. The truth is most goods are in fact abundant – just take note of all of the underused machines and living space throughout the developed […]

  • Living in an Abundant World | The Unbounded Spirit

    […] Source: “An Abundant World,” from […]

  • Un valore sostenibile | Lo Scrigno Delle Meraviglie

    […] Questo pilastro esplora il concetto di valori sostenibili – valori come l’empatia, la compassione, la gentilezza, la fiducia, l’integrità, la trasparenza, l’amore, il dono, onestà. L’unica cosa che i valori sostenibili hanno in comune è la loro abbondanza. Essere avidi ed egoisti genera una mentalità di scarsità. Si trasforma tutto in un gioco a somma zero. Più per voi è meno per me. Ma i valori sostenibili sono diversi. Se offro l’amore, esso cresce. Quando sono in empatia con l’altro e i loro sentono il coraggio di ricambiare, entrambi stiamo meglio. Valori sostenibili abbracciano naturale tendenza della Natura verso l’abbondanza . […]

  • The Effects of Fearing Death | The Lazy Activizt

    […] void of pollution and toxic chemicals, and sustainable ways of living on the planet. An abundant world is possible but only if we take yet another cue from nature by focusing on meeting the present […]

  • christine gardner

    We all need to consider alternatives to the chaotic way we as human beings look at and live our lives. I know that statistics can be manipulated to suit every situation but if we as individuals look at even our own local area we can see how changes could be made and maybe then we could group together to bring about change ! You don’t have to be an eco – warrior or a political activist , just a person that cares about your family, friends and the place that you live to begin with, after that who knows you may even want to help others further away !!. Everything thing starts with that first step, so read this article and see what you think !!!!!!!!

  • Wynand

    Well written article… First we must defeat the poverty(scarcity) mindset in our minds… We could start by giving something away. Once you give something away, you realize how much you really have to be grateful for. Live simplistic, give a lot.

    I think it was Churchill that said: “we make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give”

  • Jo

    When I started my consulting business Pollen Strategy, I knew that I could charge a significantly higher hourly rate than what amounted to “enough”, for me. So I set my “enough” rate and then added 25%, and am still one of the most affordable consultants on the market. That 25% of revenue I use to philanthropically reinvest into society and, particularly, the environment. It is my belief that all of us must make a decision to give back altruistically to the environment that sustains us, and to growing the common good. If we do, so many of our imminent crises will be solved.

  • james

    the sun is the only energy we have (besides a little kinetic stuff like ocean currents and wind). it’s quite abundant, but i don’t think it’s as abundant as described in this article. using any more energy is too much and unsustainable.

  • Josh

    The aim of any money making force is to create scarcity, or the illusion of such. Our world is at the highest levels, governed, run and supported by the biggest money grabbing elites. Until this changes ‘abundance’ will remain a word only to be used in relation to ‘profit’. No longer is monetary wealth the greatest concern of our planet, but instead the wealth of the environment and lives of it’s occupants.

Something to Say?